Twelve questions before you commit
Understand the costs, what the AI does, and how handoff works. See the sources behind four providers’ offers and how KANYU addresses the same questions.
Checked October 10, 2026. Official conditions, individual reviews and gaps in our verification are labelled separately. This is not a service ranking.
For service businesses seeking websites, marketing and customer management together through a selective revenue-share partnership. View offer
Official condition
Its FAQ says data cannot be exported; provider-built websites and workflows remain Wonderly’s property unless agreed otherwise.
Our basic static website includes the agreed source files, using your domain and compatible hosting account. Export and transfer options for third-party CRM, phone or AI tools are checked before integration.
Official condition
Its FAQ keeps qualifying revenue share in force for five years from each lead’s introduction, even after cancellation.
We have no published fixed commission plan. Any outcome-based proposal first needs agreed sources, existing-customer and duplicate rules, attribution dates, refunds and exit settlement.
Official condition
Supplied leads require its CRM. Other electronic-signature platforms need written approval or may incur a fee.
We first review your email, forms and booking tools. Website work, promotion preparation and AI trial integration have separate scopes; testing establishes what can stay and what needs changing.
Review check: Trustpilot showed 12 reviews, all five-star. We found no negative review that we could reliably attribute to its AI service; that does not establish an absence of complaints. Signed terms still determine fees and obligations.
For remodeling and local service businesses seeking websites, local search and enquiry follow-up in a performance-based offer. View offer
Different public descriptions
The financing page says zero setup cost; its Mississauga page says low-cost setup. These may be different offers. Public information does not settle the final fee or ad budget.
Each service gets its own scope. A single proposal separates build, maintenance, media spend and third-party usage costs. Unconfirmed costs are not described as free.
Scope of performance claims
Its services page describes first-place local rankings and a cost-per-lead reduction from $85 to $7. The material we read does not establish which budgets, locations or clients those results apply to.
Website acceptance covers pages and functionality. A separate acquisition pilot would define location, service, budget and qualified enquiries. A demo, impressions or a launch do not count as orders.
Gap in our verification
The homepage lists a 4.9 rating and 127 Google reviews. We did not retrieve those original reviews, so we cannot verify their content or conclude that they do not exist.
Concept websites are labelled as demos. Real cases and reviews require permission and a traceable source. We currently show no unverified client results for running AI systems.
Review check: we found no attributable negative customer review. BBB showed zero reviews and zero complaints; Clutch showed no reviews. Those separate platforms neither verify the Google count nor establish service quality.
For service businesses seeking ongoing website and acquisition support through tiered monthly plans, including a plan with AI call answering. View offer
Official plan scope
Growth excludes AI call answering; the higher-priced Growth Pro includes it. Setup, monthly, organic-lead and advertising charges vary by plan. The site states there are no long-term contracts.
Website work, promotion pages and AI trial integration can be discussed separately. We establish whether you need text answers, booking or call handling before checking costs and compatibility.
Individual review and company response
Ethan’s review focuses on appointments; 99 Calls responds with lead counts, ad budget and missed calls. These are different measures and do not establish typical performance.
An acquisition pilot would first define a qualified enquiry and who responds, then track enquiries, appointments, quotes, sales and collected payments separately. Required data access is agreed first.
Individual review and company response
Jesus reports website and domain handoff difficulties when cancelling. The response discusses falling leads and advertising, without addressing each handoff concern. This is one account, not a general practice.
The basic static-site proposal lists source files, asset licences and account ownership. Phone, booking or CRM additions need separate checks for transfer, export, shutdown order and possible costs.
Review context: Google showed 4.8/5 across 200 reviews. The two selected one-star reviews are by Ethan Haasenritter and Jesus Mendoza; both reviews and responses displayed “a year ago.” These are the parties’ accounts, not audited billing or call evidence. Selected low ratings do not represent all customers.
For service businesses wanting monthly website and online-marketing support, with content, advertising and AI features offered through plans and add-ons. View offer
Official plans and an individual review
Plans are monthly, with separate AI Voice and ad-management charges. David reports four leads in eight months. One customer’s account cannot establish typical results or their cause.
Website delivery and suitable marketing enquiries are assessed separately. Any promotion work first needs a budget, channels and review points; publishing activity is not a substitute for customer outcomes.
Individual customer experiences
Kelley describes rewriting industry content; Jose describes mismatched images and branding. The company apologised to Jose about branding and the exit experience. These are specific customer accounts.
We check services, areas and permitted case material before writing or selecting images, then seek your approval. AI trial integration uses approved information, with uncertain requests routed to a person under the agreed workflow.
Individual review and company response
The website offers monthly cancellation. Jose reports reactivation and migration difficulties after cancelling; the company says it is improving handoff and cancellation. This does not show that every customer faces the same problem.
Deliverables for the basic static site are listed in advance. Third-party cancellation, data export, renewals and migration costs are checked separately: stopping service and completing a migration are different tasks.
Review context: Google showed 4.8/5 across 437 reviews. Selected one-star dates are preserved as displayed: David Bernard “3 months ago,” Kelley Land Management “4 months ago,” and Jose Castillo “Edited 11 months ago.” Jose’s company response displayed “a year ago” and described improvements; no response was visible for the other two during our inspection. This is a selected sample, not an independent outcome audit.
KANYU prepared this comparison. We build basic static websites and assess promotion pages and AI integrations. We have no verified running client AI case. The checks and written agreements described here are not a ready-made ad-management service, round-the-clock AI reception or a lead guarantee.
Recheck current provider offers and contracts before buying. Review context retains authors, displayed relative dates and visible responses; a few reviews do not establish general quality, and finding no negative review does not prove an absence of problems. KANYU’s scope, fees, rights and deliverables are governed by the written proposal you approve.